Once more, we look at a few ways to shoot a magnet across a room. This isn’t a thing we recommend doing with magnets – it’s not their primary use! Looking at it a little more closely, we hope to learn something new about magnets.
We’re going to make a few of these contraptions, show the results, and try to figure out what’s going on.
First, let’s say what we’re NOT making: We’re not making a coil gun.
A coil gun consists of a series of electromagnets wrapped around a tube. By switching them on and off at just the right time, the electromagnets can attract a steel projectile, accelerating it down the tube. It’s a really neat project, made with electromagnets and some electronics wizardry.
This site is one of our favorite, in-depth descriptions of how you could make a coil gun. It goes into great detail with theory, analysis and some examples of some that were actually built.
A rail gun uses the same idea, but with different construction. Instead of coils of wire with electricity running through them, it uses two rails along the length of the barrel. A steel projectile connects the two rails, producing magnetic forces that propel it down the barrel. This results in insanely high currents, but can propel the projectile fast enough to make a nasty weapon.
This video is a short news clip about the US Navy's work on rail guns for future shipboard weapons.
We’re also not making a “Gauss Gun.” That’s a name commonly given to a series of magnets and steel balls, which shoots a steel ball off the end. We’ve already made one! See our earlier Gauss Guns article.
What we’re after is something we’ve seen in a few places, especially in YouTube videos. A series of magnets is arranged on either side of a wood rail. A smaller magnet is placed between them, and is somehow propelled down the rail at high speed. It looks like a cool demonstration, but what’s going on here? How does it work?
How can we replicate this setup? Do the magnets need to be angled like that? What other configurations are equivalent? Where does the energy to push the magnet come from? We hope to answer all these questions and more.
Let's take a closer look at what's going on here. A row of angled block magnets is arranged on either side of a wooden slot. They are set so that all the north poles are facing downrange, down the barrel.
The projectile is a series of four or five B666 or B666-N52 block magnets, also arranged with the north pole facing down the barrel. We could also use a single, long cylinder magnet. In our experiments, it shot well with either projectile.
The forces felt by the projectile changes direction as it progresses along the barrel. Here, we break this down into four stages:
Why are the blocks angled? We’re not sure. Maybe it’s with some hope of creating some kind of perpetual motion setup. While we didn’t find that, we could shoot magnets even better with the same blocks set straight, in a simple row.
Here's the same graph and depiction of forces for this setup below.
Since the straight blocks work well, why not surround the barrel with a whole ring? If we consider a cross-sectional slice through the center of a ring magnet, we find the magnetic field looks just like the setup with blocks on either side. The advantage of a ring is that we get even more magnet material surrounding the barrel.
Not every cylinder magnet will shoot well through every ring. Some combinations are downright duds. Here are a few we settled on that worked well:
We used the plastic coated magnet because it’s a much more durable projectile. We could use plain magnets, but wanted to avoid breaking a lot of magnets when they slam into our steel targets. Brittle neodymium magnets won’t hold up to repeated abuse like this!
With a little creativity, this setup makes a nice magnetic cannon…
It's our duty to try this same trick with the biggest magnets we could find. We made a ¾” thick ring magnet by stacking three RZ0X84 magnets together, forming a 3” O.D. x 1-1/2” I.D. x 3/4” thick ring. We secured this to a PVC pipe that was large enough to shoot a DX0C magnet projectile.
Don’t try this at home!
No. The energy that shoots the projectile magnet out the end is equal to the energy required to push it into position in the first place.
As an analogy, think of it like pushing a toy car up a hill. It takes some amount of energy to push the toy car from the bottom of the hill up to the top. When you nudge the car off the top of the hill and it races down, the total energy you get isn't more than what it took to push it up there in the first place. Actually, it will have less energy, because you always lose to things like friction, air resistance, etc. Thermodynamics is a drag.
If you want to think about work and energy with this magnetic cannon, the same story applies.
Work, or energy, is boiled down to its simplest terms by considering it as a force applied to something across a distance. Imagine a box on the floor. You push on the box with 10 lb of force which slides it 20 feet across the room. You've done work! How much? 10 lb x 20 ft = 200 ft lb. If you like different units, you could say that's about 271 joules, or 0.000075 kilowatt hours.
(If you push on the box, and it doesn't move, you haven't done any work. Sure, you might get tired, but we haven't done any actual work on the box in the physics-sense of the word.)
To understand the amount of work done by the magnet cannon, we need to find some measure of force vs. distance. Fortunately, those graphs above show exactly that! Force x distance in this case is the area under the curve. If we measure out the force it takes to push the magnet to the point where it will shoot, we find out that it's the same area as the part that pushes the projectile out.
Be careful with powerful magnets!